h4831sc for Dummies
h4831sc for Dummies
Blog Article
Because there will not seem like any "official" Load Data out there for this Load, can many of you present a starting point with this mixture and points to consider when Performing this Load up?
They have got performed identically for me. Like All people else I rushed to obtain the more recent SC Model but have now switched back. Ideally you'd like about one hundred% loading density. When you've got ample situation ability for the H4831(prolonged) you are possibly far better off.
The reality that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you're viewing increased velocities obtained with that powder, versus That which you've witnessed with the IMR stuff. Also fantastic powder, but somewhat much better suited to a little bit scaled-down circumstances by using a bit significantly less ability.
Together with the 154 grain Hornady SP during the 280, H4831 gave me great groups and good velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a drastically bigger velocity and provides marginally far better accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos within the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave outstanding accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally greater. For that reason, in Each individual of such instances I went with A different powder, but I will surely loathe to divest myself on the H4831.
In any case, I realized The 2 lbs of H4831SC utilised the exact same data, but I didn't know whether there was something distinct among a pound of powder labeled "Excessive" and one particular not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon confirmed which they were being in actual fact equivalent and the one variance was The emblem on the label.
It can be probable that no even further discussion is required, in which circumstance we propose starting off a brand new thread. If however you really feel your reaction is required you could even now do so.
i've utilised both equally and made use of the very same charges and possess not been in the position to explain h4831 vs h4831sc to any noticable discrepancies with general performance. the SC Variation meters a little smoother is about all. any comments??
and you might want to spend money on some new load data publications. powder composition and chemistry can does alter over time. 4831 powder of many years in the past is not exact same as what's currently available. that may be why somebody seriously interested in reloading securely will have the most present-day load data textbooks to confer with.
Any load data to support that? My initial imagined is it's actually not intending to burn all of the way and velocities is going to be sluggish h4831sc load data and in every single place. Might be a nice fireworks Screen!
Liberalism; The impossible yet recognized notion that it is solely attainable to pick up a turd by the clean up conclusion.
This is often an older thread, you might not receive a response, and will be reviving an old thread. You should think about creating a new thread.
Immediately after reading through this short article (and a lot of Other individuals, but this one is considered the h4831 vs h4831sc most data pushed with a number of accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or staying inside a magical length from the lands, and commenced loading where I could enhance many elements of a load. Just my .02, ideally you can get anything to operate for ya.
arkansas or ohio i hardly ever seen a change aside from the frequent is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan.
The point that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is exactly why you are observing bigger velocities obtained with that powder, as opposed to Everything you've witnessed While using the IMR things.